* Soft validation UI needs to be on both questions being validated
* Fix whether the box is checked or not
* All checkboxes are integers now
* Fix
* Use enums as well for consistency
* Use capybara matcher for less flakiness
* Click link already waits
* Add a retry to our fetch so tests are more resilient to intermittent network issues
Devise is a commonly used gem for user authentication and management. Using
rails generators and Devise allows us to get a lot of boilerplate code for
user authentication and management and means we don't have to revinvent the
wheel. Styling will need to be done for the necessary pages and there are
likely to be bits of generated code that can be deleted. This will act as
a starting point to be built up from using TDD.
* Working except for selenium checkbox issues
* Remove old debug message
* Make sure we only run the stimulus init once per page load
* Revert that
* Rubocop
* Use data targets rather than id lookup, so that coupling is explicit
* Use fetch
* Schema update
* No schema changes introduced here
* Add a request spec for the new controller
* Schema order did change
* map over forEach
* Update factory fields
* Int for booleans :(
* Fix spec fields
* Lazy create
* migration wip
* change field names to lowercase and fix the tests
* Change national and ethnic field types and map to correct enums
* change ecstat column types
* Change prevten field type
* Change homeless field type
* Change benefit cap field type
* Put db enums in one folder and add a few new field changes"
* change field type for housing needs
* Change illness field type
* display checkbox answers
* cbl, chr, cap
* Change tenancy and tenancylength field types
* Change landlord and rsnvac field types
* Change unittype_gn field type
* Reasonble preference displaying on check answers
* update more field types
* Fix typo in comumn name
* Change more types
* Test fixes
* Add adr
* fix some tests
* run migration
* Fix tests
Co-authored-by: Matthew Phelan <matthew.phelan@madetech.com>
* Init
* Add some tests
* Add failing spec
* Move soft validations into a module
* Update test
* Rubocop
* Scope are auto created by enums
* Rename folder to validations
* No instance variable
* Commit both lines
* Add error indication
* Make partial slightly more generic
* Fix back link
* Write failing test
* All specs currently passing. Can this be real?
* Check page should have an override question
* Fix back button for check answers pages
* Don't really need a wrapper method for the validations
* We're really validating a page here not a question
* Dup variable
* Bit of a nasty hack but maybe better than deriving back link?
* Set a no cache header instead of reloading
* Move a teeny bit of logic out of the controller
* Rubocop
* Extract method
* Add other_tenancy_type conditional field
* Extract private validdate_other_field_method
* Implement other tenancy type validation
* Add missing migration file and update API doc
* Add fixed term tenancy validation
* refactor validate_fixed_term_tenancy
* add fixed_term_tenancy pattern to api docs and make it dynamically not required
* Add validate_net_income_uc_proportion validation/
* refactor validation method;
* Update net income options in doc
* rubocop
* refactor validate_net_income_uc_proportion and increase the persons checked to 8
* rename tenant economic status field
* Change condition format in json
* Add test for multiple conditions
* Check multiple conditions
* nearly better
* check the condition for route without checcking the question type
* remove a comment and an unused variable
Co-authored-by: magicmilo <milobascombe@gmail.com>
* Add next page path method with conditional routing
* Rename method
* Fix the tests and add files to .gitignore
* Make get_next_page_path a private method
* WIP test for total question count
* Change back button to use rails navigation
* Make total number of questions work with conditional routing and run rubocop
* Add tests for conditional question displaying
* Add conditional routing to the check answers page
* push 1 failure
* make total_questions step over the form like a user would and gather relevand questions
* Fix the tests
* fixed checks answers labels
* small refactors and rubocop
* remove unused code from get next page path
Co-authored-by: Kat <katrina@madetech.com>
Co-authored-by: magicmilo <milobascombe@gmail.com>
No errors need to be added if the net income is given as 0 but no frequency
is provided. It just needs to be made not required if the net income is
refused (given as 0) so that the record can still be added.
magicmilo
Daniel Baark
MadeTech Dushan
kosiakkatrina
Matthew Phelan
baarkerlounger
Dushan